“It’s about getting people to realize that they should not be thinking about being, as one 8-year-old put it to me, ‘a white family with a weird child,’ but a multiracial family,” Ms. Stigger said. “The way most white people use the term ‘colorblind’ is just silly. We want to create color aware families, not colorblind families.” Breaking Through Adoption’s Racial Barriers By LYNETTE CLEMETSON and RON NIXON
Published: August 17, 2006 New York Times
At the heart of this story lies a very interesting point within the confines of faciality, what it is to be raised black, and what it is to be raised black from an outside perspective. while the story brings to light some points of interest in the areas of "transracial" adoption (which I am cool with as long as all participants are ready to man the hell up) since I wasnt privy to all the data I will base my assumptions on the data provided.
Geography the importance of space in social development- "A white judge initially denied Nick and Emily Mebruer’s petition to adopt a black child, ruling that the Mebruers, a white couple who live in rural Lebanon, Mo., were “uniquely unqualified” to parent a black child because of their limited interaction with black people and culture." While this ruling was overturned I think the focus of the means to disqualify the family was vaguely defined, and rooted in theories which end up leaving children without the opportunity to grow up within a family setting. Not saying that the Judge wasnt on the right path, but just saying "uniquely unqualified" is an extremely weak "politcally correct" cop out. Now if this couple was from the Bay Area (Berekely, Oakland, San Francisco) do you think this ruling would be appropriate? Are white people who are exposed to Black people on the regular more suitable subjects for transracial adoption? We could argue these points, but this would be a superficial argument at best, even the article cites research from an individual right out of this process "Robert O’Connor, 39, who was raised by a white family in Rush City, Minn., recalled his struggles growing up in a small town with few other blacks. Throughout his youth, he said, he felt awkward around other blacks." I think the parameters need to be one identified, explored, understood, then acted upon, by white people who want to enter into these types of responsibilities (hence the man the hell up). The responsibility of a parenting is now twofold with the responsibility of providing these black children with the proper exposure the their indigenous culture, sans bias, without the caveat of "colorblindness". There are too many babies without homes for me to squander away time that could be spent in a nurturing environment, but that environment must be equiped to handle the social and cultural needs of the subject. The love will find away mentality is a quick ticket to sentiments provided by Mr. O'Connor and others in the story.
Foreign vs Domestic- What I didnt seem to understand was the reoccuring theme of foreign vs domestic, and why every one cited in the story who was against this practice happend to be black (american). Either these are some very short sighted individuals or I 'm reading into this waaay to much. My question is whats the difference if a white couple adopts a little child from Rawanda or one from Detroit? The child is still black, the parents still have the twofold responsibility, every dynamic that was in place before is still in place. It also goes to show the scope of the plight of black children on a global scale (stop thinking local folks, this is global).
Hero worship- What I see from some of our more publicized adoptions as of recent, is the glamoritization of the white savior (see forms of thought for the analysis). While I hope that this would never be the intent of an individual who chooses to adopt a black child, it is something that needs to be addressed.What is your intent, is this some sort of psuedo altruism based on shallow notions which indirectly satisfy your own ego? or is this truly the one fight you are prepared to take on knowing there is no final round, no end, once you go black you never go back...
Variables- Since we are on the topic of transracial adoptions lets take it "above the rim". Lets say two white women (lesbians married in New Hampshire) decide to adopt a little black boy what are the parameters involved here? Now we got the race/sex thing right up front where we really, really, dont like it!
For the good or the bad that surrounds the global future, I for one do see a more "multicultural" society but not in the superficial redundant usage of the word we kick around today. I mean a multicultural society where everyone understands and values the cultures present on this planet (WHITE PEOPLE ESPECIALLY AND PRIMARILLY) to a degree where condescending notions are cast aside to make way for the true "civilized" stanards we (you) claim to want for humankind.
“We felt like it was an indictment of us and our entire community,” said Mrs. Mebruer, a family doctor, as Maggie played with a black doll in the center of the living room and danced to the Australian children’s group the Wiggles. “It was assuming that we didn’t have the desire or the capacity to learn.”
"Cowboy Up"
NARO%

10 comments:
Good post. I think the question of domestic vs. foreign comes down to the fact that there is an over abundance of black/biracial children who are available for adoption. Instead of adopting these kids, some adoptive parents adopt from China or Africa instead of helping out fellow Americans. In some ways, this is a provincial attitude that values American lives over those of foreign children. On the other hand, it does force the issue of whether some adoptive parents deliberately choose not to adopt a black/biracial child because of anti-black racism.
I know a number of people who ask the latter question when they see stories about foreign adoptions.
What's also interesting is that there is a new trend for black/biracial children being sent to other countries, like Canada and Germany for adoption. Australian actor Hugh Jackman and his wife adopted their son Maximillian, who is biracial, from the U.S.
Anonymous thanks for the input lets address some of the points which you brought up.
domestic vs. foreign comes down to the fact that there is an over abundance of black/biracial children who are available for adoption.
The numeric factor: This is why I titled the entry tertiary awareness because a lot people fail to exercise it. The number of black children available for adoption in the US exceeds the number in Africa? Do you know how crazy that sounds? Lets do some critical analysis here for just one minute. How could the US possibly have more black children "available" than Africa? This country/continent (forward thinking) leads the world in the 3 primary areas which produced orphaned children; War, Famine, and Disease. Just because the west has a "system/institution" emplaced to maintain and handle these children as well as the means to quantify them does not mean it has "more" children eligible for adoption. When we go this route we are tending to get into semantics and their effects on statistics which can be easily skewed based on the parameters chosen. Do you honestly think there are more black orphans/children who could be classed as eligible for adoption in the US than Africa? Ask any NGO worker who has been to many of the African countries torn apart by the 3 causes mentioned earlier and have them explain the African orphan "epidemic". EYES WIDE SHUT ring a bell? Are we allowing or intentions to be swayed based upon a technicality? Is a child who is classified as an orphan eligible for adoption, and if you say yes to that is it the the fault of African nations who may not have the infrastructure both systematic and institutional to provide these "orphaned" children with the same "class/title" as there American counterparts. We are walking away from reality when we reinforce statements like these based upon the skewed data given. Millions of children orphaned because of war, aids, and famine. Orphans = Children eligible for adoption. Just because we have a system doesn't mean "our" numbers reflect the true state of the world, change the filter on your lens (better yet take it off), that's the problem with America and the west as a whole, only our numbers matter...
some adoptive parents adopt from China or Africa instead of helping out fellow Americans. In some ways, this is a provincial attitude that values American lives over those of foreign children.
I agree that this exists but lets look at the LCD in this factor. The practice of adoption ends with preference: If you look at the census chart provided by the NYT it goes to show the number of black children adopted nationally and internationally both making up 1% of all adoptions by white households, having just invalidated the whole numbers game emplaced (mentioned above) our 1% (white Americans adopting black American children) is far greater than the 1% adopted internationally based upon the "real" definition of children eligible for adoption. But lets get back to preference... This is a purely a personal characteristic and no matter the altruistic intent if white people want to adopt white babies, black babies, Asian babies, the choice is made based on preference. If it wasn't then adoption agencies would provided children with homes based upon qualia other than sheer numbers and the "cost" involved with selection. Choice would be forgone and you would be given a child based upon your sole desire to adopt and not your "preference". This nationalist burden imposed upon the "preference" further reduces the possibility for black children (all) to find an opportunity for a loving environment. While I agree that there a many children in the US who need a home, do I brush the rest aside because they are not American (made in America mentality) at least we have a system in place to assist these children with the process (hence our inflated notion that we have the most black babies that are in need of adoption in the world) but what about the countries that don't have these systems? Even worse what about the countries which cater to white people who desire non white babies solely as a means to generate income? Because in the end a lot of the "resentment" comes from the fact of how much money these people spent "when they coulda stayed at home" and adopted in the US. This is what tertiary awareness is all about, its stretching what you think, what you see, what you believe, beyond "you" and taking it to where it really is, and a lot of people don't wanna go there.
it does force the issue of whether some adoptive parents deliberately choose not to adopt a black/biracial child because of anti-black racism.
Hey that's why I ended the entry with "Cowboy Up" If you aint ready to play hard ball, then maybe you aren't ready to play at all. While I don't want to say that the "avoiding of anti-black racism" is a scapegoat it just goes to show you that at least from your POV that some white people don't want to deal with the problems of racism (hell me too!!!). So I look at this as a qualifier and a very good one, if they choose not to accept the challenge then its probably a good indicator of the their abilities in the area of raising black children. We all know the scope and power of racism/white supremacy, so not wanting to challenge it is understandable (especially if your white); who on top of all of the challenges of raising a child wants the worlds biggest monkey on their back?
there is a new trend for black/biracial children being sent to other countries, like Canada and Germany for adoption.
I could care less if they sent these children to mars as long as they have the opportunity to grow up in a nurturing culturally aware environment- not colorblind, not the lovey dovey love will find away BS, not one that promotes assimilation, all of these are the easy way out for the ADOPTER not the Adoptee!In the end this is about the children and not the individual who wants to do some good, I'll say that again, this is about the children, and not what you want to do. Once you reframe your intent (which is good) to the needs of the individual affected by your intent, do you begin to see the weight of your responsibility? This is why I referred people to my other blog (forms of thought) on "Hero Worship" which digs into superficial notions of the"white psyche" proliferated via the mass media. I am going to adopt an African baby because (__________) is already setting the stage for the condescending notions which are/were prevalent in the primary/secondary levels of awareness in the article on adopting black children (all).
Like I stated the focus should be on the children, its the responsibility of the adopter to provide these children with every opportunity in life they can regardless of the challenges they may face, once again"COWBOY UP"
My final words: to those (white people) who opt for the "I would adopt a black baby if it weren't for the racism" ya'll aint even ready to"Cowboy up" you need to wake up"...
Peace
Pic thread! (1392 views)White couples shunning white babies to adopt blacks (1150 views)Stormfront Radio - All New (616 views)Would you date a white who has dated a non-white? (614 views)Whats with the Aryan Hitler worship of some members? (602 views)Uncover Cop's Racism on Stormfront Sparks Anger (528 views)Suspect Arrested In Thailand - JonBenet Ramsey Case (512 views)Have you ever "been" with a non-White? (500 views)Brimstone's latest nonsense (475 views)Is everyone only giving out one rep point now! (439 views)
Ok, and your point is? I dont need stormfront to show/tell me things that are pretty much expost facto (as far as thoughts and beliefs)...
Deez
I saw this dork putting those stormfront links elsewhere. I actually need to go over and read them, so I can do another you may be a white supremacist if post.
Anyways, by the end of the weekend I would like to have my own post on this subject. I agree with many of your views, but I would also like to do a little reframing of the issue for the sake of deconstructing racism. So my post is going to start out by reframing the debate--let's talk about "Black people adopting white kids." All those ws trolls over at my site are going to get pissy over it. LOL!!!
That's where I am going to start....
naro%, good post. I agree you better be prepared to "cowboy up" and I think that is eye opening for alot of white folks. I mean at least Mebruers are learning, and they have alot to learn. I am a white adoptive parent of a black son too, in fact I live not far from the Mebruers. Our son's b-parents (on student visas here from Africa) chose us to adopt and we keep it open with visits because we have alot to learn & they have alot to offer. We do have black friends around who are our support too. No way are we color blind. We want him to know his connection, his people here, his culture in Africa & his tribe and we are working at it. This little man is bound for greatness already he is opening alot of minds with his mere presence & that has got to be a good thing.
Looking for information and found it at this great site... lexapro vs zoloft interracial bones vinyl digital printing What is valtrex 3f valtrex adverse reaction valtrex blonde olivia vitamins in mango Information for effexor xr recreational hiking canadian rockies accidents statistics www americal com valtrex Zyban tablete
This is very interesting site... Lease surveillance camera aston martin car hoods liquid vitamins engineering computer consultants Endomorph losing weight betting
Very nice site! »
Thanks for the post. I'm in an interracial marriage (I'm black and my husband is white)and we want to adopt. It irritates me on both sides that a magazine would only site black people as the opponents to transracial adoption when there are all types of colors that oppose (in our case, we can't even dream about applying to China because they are very much against it because we're a mixed couple. We're told that "You'll have a bit of trouble" Nobody talks about that mess)placing black kids in white families. It irritates me that some people in my own race believe that it's better for these kids to have no family rather than a white family. These kids just want to be loved for who they are, they dream of having families. It doesn't seem right that some people would sacrifice what's good for these kids (and it is better for them to have a family)bevause they have problems with their own selves. Nobody's going to thank those people for keeping them in foster care or orphanages. Me? I'd rather for a girl/boy -whether they are international or domestic- find a loving family regardless of race that loves them for who they are and aren't trying to "save" them or expect them to be thankful that they adopted them. People tend to forget that they're adopting children, not things, and the kids are the most important. That's my .02
Post a Comment